https://reactingconsortium.org/games/darwin1861
Marsha Driscoll, M., Dunn, E. E., Siems, D., and Swanson, B. K. (n.d.). Charles Darwin, the Copley Medal, and the Rise of Naturalism,
1861-1864. Reacting Consortium. https://reactingconsortium.org/games/darwin1861
Instructor must join Reacting Consortium to access content.
Class Size: 10-23 students recommended. there are 23 named roles and the game also includes generic “A-Man and X-Man roles.”
Class Time: 2 setup sessions, 8 game sessions, and 1 debrief session are recommended. For an abridged version, sessions 3-5 can be cut out. However, cutting these sessions will impact the presentation opportunities for some characters.
Synopsis: “This game thrusts students into the intellectual ferment of Victorian England just after publication of On The Origin of Species. Since its appearance in 1859, Darwin’s long-awaited treatise in “genetic biology” had received reviews both favorable and damning. Thomas Huxley and Samuel Wilberforce’s arguments for and against the theory sparked a vigorous, complex debate that touched on a host of issues and set the stage for the Royal Society’s consideration of whether or not they ought to award Darwin the Copley Medal, their most prestigious prize. While the action takes place in meetings of the Royal Society, Great Britain’s most important scientific body, a parallel and influential public argument smoldered over the nature of science and its relationship to modern life in an industrial society. A significant component of the Darwin game is the tension between natural and teleological views of the world. But the scientific debate also percolated through a host of related issues: the meaning and purposes of inductive and hypothetical-speculation in science; the professionalization of science; the implications of Darwinism for social reform, racial theories, and women’s rights; and the evolving concept of causation in sciences and its implications for public policy. The Revised Edition updates this venerable game to incorporate current Reacting best practices while preserving the core intellectual drama.”
